Does radiometric dating show that rocks are millions of years old? This dating method requires assumptions about the content of the original rocks and the decay rate in the past.Since the Bible is clear about the earth’s age of thousands of years, the popular assumptions are wrong.

radiometric dating is wrong-60

To the contrary, we now have impeccable evidence that radioactive decay rates were greatly sped up at some point during the past, for example, during the global catastrophic Genesis Flood. He has told us when He created everything and thus how old the universe is.

So we finite humans should fearlessly embrace His testimony of a young earth, recorded in His inerrant Word.

When scientists date rocks, they don’t actually observe the atoms changing.

It’s like making sure that an hourglass clock was set with all the sand in the top bowl at the beginning.

However, no geologists were present when the earth and its many rock layers were formed, so they cannot know where the radiometric clocks were set at the beginning.

Also, we have to be sure that the clock has ticked at the same rate from the beginning until now.No geologists have been observing the radiometric clocks for millions of years to check that the rate of radioactive decay has always been the same as the rate today.God took great care to include the necessary chronological details of the universe’s creation in six literal days, as well as the unbroken genealogies of mankind from Adam to Jesus.So we have absolutely no doubt that the earth is only around six thousand years old.Contrary to Scripture, many geologists claim that radiometric “clocks” show rocks to be millions of years old.However, to read any clock accurately we must know where the clock was set at the beginning.